Wednesday, September 28, 2005

The New York %&#@ Times

I'm sure I'm not the only person who is perturbed at the Times' new pay-for-content site.

I used to troll their site several times a day, but now I can't get Frank Rich or Maureen Dowd without paying $49.95 a year. That just sucks.

I guess I've been spoiled.

*sigh*

6 Comments:

At 9/30/2005 11:56 PM, Blogger Anocsanamun said...

where are you girl!

I need a fix!

 
At 10/02/2005 5:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm wondering how his birthday went... did she have a surprise planned for him? ~ E

 
At 10/04/2005 11:21 AM, Blogger JD said...

Now that's just annoying.

To Rhythmo Productions -- I don't know who you are, but I'd appreciate if you would keep your grubby marketing paws out of my blog. I don't know who thought this would be a good idea. Anyone else out there have this crap show up in their comments? Cease and desist or I will report you to the blog police.

 
At 10/04/2005 9:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Leave Janey alone, SHE's NOT married. Don't crucify her for HIS infidelity.

 
At 10/05/2005 1:51 PM, Blogger JD said...

To Anonymous #1: Ya doesn't have to read if ya doesn't like the subject. Maybe a playground with safer rides might be a better place for you, honey. You might get hurt on the jungle jim at this one.

To Anonymous #2: Isn't it interesting how, in this type of situation, everyone goes after the single, unattached woman and NOT the man who actually made the commitment? I think it reveals a lot about people's true attitudes and judgements about women and sex.

 
At 11/08/2005 8:59 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi,

This is Erik Feder, author of "The Feder Guide..." which is mentioned at the top of this blog. I apologise for our initial post - our intern Jeanette was supposed to request permission from blog moderators BEFORE posting, but we had a communication breakdown and she just went ahead and posted without asking. Again, I apologise. She is no longer posting anywhere without getting permission first.

Thanks for your understanding,

Erik

 

Post a Comment

<< Home